Making Lexical Ontologies Functional and Context-Sensitive
نویسندگان
چکیده
Human categorization is neither a binary nor a context-free process. Rather, some concepts are better examples of a category than others, while the criteria for category membership may be satisfied to different degrees by different concepts in different contexts. In light of these empirical facts, WordNet’s static category structure appears both excessively rigid and unduly fragile for processing real texts. In this paper we describe a syntagmatic, corpus-based approach to redefining WordNet’s categories in a functional, gradable and context-sensitive fashion. We describe how the diagnostic properties for these definitions are automatically acquired from the web, and how the increased flexibility in categorization that arises from these redefinitions offers a robust account of metaphor comprehension in the mold of Glucksberg’s (2001) theory of category-inclusion. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this competence with figurative categorization can effectively be governed by automatically-generated ontological constraints, also acquired from the web.
منابع مشابه
A context-sensitive framework for lexical ontologies
Human categorization is neither a binary nor a context-free process. Rather, the criteria that govern the use and recognition of certain concepts may be satisfied to different degrees in different contexts. In light of this reality, the idealized, static structure of a lexical ontology like WordNet appears both excessively rigid and unduly fragile when faced with real texts that draw upon diffe...
متن کاملContexts and Ontologies in Schema Matching
In this paper, we propose a general model of schema matching based on the following ideas: on the one hand, a schema is viewed as a context (namely as a partial and approximate representation of the world from an agent’s perspective); on the other hand, a schema cannot be assigned any arbitrary interpretation, as the meaning of the expressions used to label nodes (and possibly arcs) may be cons...
متن کاملContext-sensitive Referencing for Ontology Mapping Disambiguation
Ontologies can be used for e-business integration, for example by describing existing e-business standards as ontologies. If cooperating parties use different ontologies, ontology mappings are needed, which can be ambiguous, thus making ontology mapping disambiguation necessary. Different disambiguation strategies exist, such as community-driven or context-sensitive referencing of ontologies, w...
متن کاملTowards a theory of lexical meaning as ontologies and construals
The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework of lexical meaning, broadly along the lines of Cognitive Semantics (Langacker 1987a). The paper focuses on interpretations of adjective-noun (ADJ N ) combinations in English. Within the proposed model, all aspects of meaning are to be explained in terms of properties of ontologies in conceptual space, i.e. properties of content ontologies and ...
متن کاملContext-driven Disambiguation in Ontology Elicitation
Ontologies represent rich semantics in a lexical way. Lexical labels are used to identify concepts and relationships, though there is no bijective mapping between them. Phenomenons such as synonyms and homonyms exemplify this, and can result in frustrating misunderstanding and ambiguity. In the elicitation and application of ontologies, the meaning of the ontological knowledge is dependent on t...
متن کامل